Baphomet is an occult figure whose history connects the medieval trial of the Knights Templar, nineteenth-century ceremonial symbolism, twentieth-century Satanic iconography, and the modern public imagery of The Satanic Temple. The familiar goat-headed, winged, androgynous figure is not a medieval portrait of a secret Templar god. It was created in the nineteenth century by the French occultist Éliphas Lévi, whose illustration of the “Sabbatic Goat” became one of the most influential images in Western occultism.
Modern audiences often use “Baphomet” as if it were simply another name for Satan. Historically the relationship is more complicated. The name existed centuries before Lévi’s image, and Lévi’s figure was designed as a symbolic synthesis of opposites rather than a straightforward portrait of the Christian Devil. Later Satanists adopted and transformed parts of that imagery, and The Satanic Temple’s monumental sculpture made Baphomet internationally recognizable in a new political and religious setting.
The Templar accusations#
The name Baphomet entered European records most famously during the persecution of the Knights Templar in the early fourteenth century. King Philip IV of France moved against the order in 1307, and Templars were interrogated under conditions that included torture. Among many accusations were claims of denying Christ, improper ritual acts, and worship of a mysterious head or idol sometimes called Baphomet.[1]
The testimony was inconsistent. Descriptions of the alleged object varied widely, and historians have not established that the Templars possessed a coherent secret Baphomet cult. Medieval heresy investigations regularly generated accusations involving idols, sexual transgression, and inversion of Christian rites. The Templar material must therefore be read in the context of political conflict, coercive interrogation, and medieval expectations about heresy.
The etymology of Baphomet is also disputed. One long-standing explanation treats it as a medieval Western corruption of “Mahomet,” meaning Muhammad, reflecting Christian misunderstandings of Islam. Other speculative etymologies have been proposed, especially by later occult writers, but there is no scholarly consensus supporting the elaborate coded meanings sometimes claimed in modern esoteric literature.
Éliphas Lévi and the Sabbatic Goat#
The image now recognized as Baphomet was published by Éliphas Lévi in Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie in the 1850s. Lévi’s drawing shows a winged humanoid with a goat’s head, female breasts, a torch between the horns, a caduceus-like form at the abdomen, one arm pointing upward and the other downward, and the Latin words solve and coagula on the arms. A pentagram appears on the forehead.[2]
Lévi’s symbolism was deliberately synthetic. The figure combines masculine and feminine traits, animal and human forms, above and below, light and darkness, and processes of dissolution and coagulation. The torch signifies intelligence or illumination; the gestures echo the hermetic formula “as above, so below”; the caduceus evokes generative and balancing forces. Rather than representing “evil” in a simple Christian sense, the design presents occult equilibrium through the reconciliation of apparent opposites.
Lévi called the image the “Goat of Mendes” and associated it with the witches’ sabbath, but his historical claims should not be treated as modern Egyptology or medieval history. He was an occult theorist creating a symbolic system. His Baphomet became influential because the image was memorable and could absorb new meanings, not because it faithfully reproduced an ancient cult statue.[3]
From Baphomet to the pentagram goat#
The modern Seal of Baphomet is distinct from Lévi’s full-bodied figure. It usually consists of a goat’s head placed within an inverted pentagram, surrounded by Hebrew letters spelling Leviathan. Versions of a goat head in a pentagram circulated before the Church of Satan, but Anton LaVey’s organization made the design one of the best-known symbols of modern Satanism.
The Church of Satan adopted the Sigil or Seal of Baphomet as its primary emblem. In this context the symbol belongs to LaVeyan Satanism, which is explicitly atheistic and materialist.[4] This is a useful reminder that Satanic imagery does not itself establish theistic belief. A pentagram, goat head, or name such as Baphomet can function as religious identity, artistic language, institutional logo, or philosophical symbol depending on who is using it.
The symbol’s popularity also led to widespread confusion between several different images: Lévi’s Sabbatic Goat, the goat-head pentagram, and generic depictions of the Devil. They are historically connected through later reception but should not be collapsed into one object.
The Satanic Temple monument#
The Satanic Temple commissioned a large bronze statue of Baphomet in the 2010s. The sculpture depicts a seated, goat-headed, winged figure flanked by two children. Its design draws clearly on Lévi while modifying the nineteenth-century image. The monument was developed in the context of The Satanic Temple’s campaigns concerning religious monuments and equal access to public forums.[5]
The statue became famous during disputes about Ten Commandments monuments on government property. Its political argument was not that every public building should display Baphomet; rather, The Satanic Temple used the possibility of a Satanic monument to challenge governmental preference for one religion. The organization is non-theistic and describes Satan as a symbol rather than a literal supernatural being.[6]
A version of the Baphomet statue is displayed at The Satanic Temple’s Salem Art Gallery in Massachusetts. Images of the monument now circulate so widely that many people encounter Baphomet first through The Satanic Temple rather than through Lévi’s books. The result is a new layer of reception: Baphomet has become associated with church-state litigation, pluralism, bodily autonomy, and contemporary religious activism as well as occultism.
Baphomet in theistic Satanism#
Theistic Satanists do not agree about Baphomet’s ontological status. For some, Baphomet is primarily a symbol created by Lévi and later adopted by Satanists. For others, the image is treated devotionally as a representation of Satan, a distinct spirit, an initiatory current, or a divine synthesis. Some occult systems interpret Baphomet through alchemy, polarity, sexuality, hermeticism, or the union of opposites.
These modern religious uses are valid evidence for what contemporary practitioners believe, but they should not be projected backward as proof that Lévi worshipped a literal goat deity or that medieval Templars practiced modern Satanism. The history of Baphomet is a clear example of reception history: a disputed medieval word was reimagined by a nineteenth-century occultist, then reworked by twentieth- and twenty-first-century Satanic movements.
Gender and duality#
Lévi’s Baphomet is intentionally androgynous. The figure combines breasts with a phallic caduceus, masculine and feminine signs, and gestures toward both heaven and earth. Modern interpreters have understood this in many ways: balance, generativity, alchemical union, rejection of binary oppositions, or transcendence of fixed categories.
Per Faxneld’s scholarship on Satanic feminism notes Baphomet as one example of the Devil or Satanic figure being given female or hermaphroditic traits in esoteric discourse.[7] This makes the image relevant not only to occult art but also to the history of gendered interpretations of Satan and transgression.
What Baphomet is—and is not#
Baphomet is best understood through several distinct historical layers:
- Medieval: a name appearing in accusations against the Knights Templar, with no securely established secret Baphomet religion.
- Nineteenth century: Éliphas Lévi’s symbolic Sabbatic Goat, a synthesis of occult correspondences and opposites.
- Twentieth century: goat-pentagram imagery becomes a major emblem of organized Satanism, particularly the Church of Satan.
- Twenty-first century: The Satanic Temple’s monument turns Baphomet into a public symbol in debates over religious liberty and pluralism.
The figure’s power comes partly from the way these layers overlap. Baphomet can look ancient while actually embodying modern occult design; it can appear “theistic” while being used by atheistic Satanists; and it can be a devotional image for one practitioner while serving as political-religious iconography for another.
For encyclopedia purposes, the safest approach is to identify which Baphomet is being discussed and whose interpretation is being described. Doing so preserves the richness of the symbol without turning later mythology into medieval fact.
See also#
- Satan
- Church of Satan
- The Satanic Temple
- Satanic symbolism
- Western esotericism
- history of modern Satanism
References
- Ruben van Luijk, Children of Lucifer: The Origins of Modern Religious Satanism (Oxford University Press, 2016) — Historical study of attributed and self-identified Satanism and the emergence of modern religious Satanism. (accessed 2026-09-07) ↩
- Éliphas Lévi, Baphomet / Sabbatic Goat illustration (Wikimedia Commons) — Public-domain nineteenth-century illustration associated with Lévi’s occult symbolism. (accessed 2026-09-07) ↩
- Wouter J. Hanegraaff, Esotericism and the Academy (Cambridge University Press, 2012) — History of the scholarly construction and study of Western esotericism. (accessed 2026-09-07) ↩
- Church of Satan, Frequently Asked Questions — Official source for the Church of Satan’s non-theistic interpretation of Satanism. (accessed 2026-09-07) ↩
- Joseph P. Laycock, Speak of the Devil: How The Satanic Temple Is Changing the Way We Talk about Religion (Oxford University Press, 2020) — Scholarly history and analysis of The Satanic Temple. (accessed 2026-09-07) ↩
- The Satanic Temple, Frequently Asked Questions — Official source for The Satanic Temple’s non-theistic beliefs and use of Satanic symbolism. (accessed 2026-09-07) ↩
- Per Faxneld and Johan Nilsson (eds.), Satanism: A Reader (Oxford University Press, 2023) — Academic sourcebook and historical overview of Satanic thought and movements. (accessed 2026-09-07) ↩