The Salem witch trials were a series of prosecutions in Massachusetts Bay Province in 1692 and 1693. Accusations spread well beyond Salem Village. Nineteen people were hanged, Giles Corey was pressed to death, and others died in prison. The executions at Salem were not burnings at the stake.[1]

The episode is important to the history of religious accusation and legal evidence. It should not be used as a list of people known to have practiced a modern Satanist religion.

From a household to a special court#

The first accusations arose in February 1692 after Betty Parris and Abigail Williams, children in the household of minister Samuel Parris, began exhibiting disturbing behavior. The University of Virginia archive places these events amid existing village disputes over Parris's ministry and support.[2]

Sarah Good, Sarah Osburn, and Tituba were among the first accused. Further allegations reached respected church members and people outside the village. Governor William Phips established the Court of Oyer and Terminer to deal with the growing number of cases.[2]

The archive's overview records accusations in twenty-four communities, at least 155 arrests, and thirty convictions. That scale helps correct the impression that the entire episode took place in one small courtroom with a fixed group of defendants.[1]

Spectral evidence and confession#

Spectral evidence involved reports that the apparition of an accused person had harmed an accuser. Its use raised a difficult question: could a reported appearance identify the person responsible for it? The archive describes how such claims helped initiate proceedings and how pressure to confess shaped the cases.[2]

A confession also changed an accused person's immediate prospects. The archive notes that confession could delay a trial, creating a powerful incentive within a capital prosecution.[2] Reading a statement without that setting can make coerced or strategically offered testimony appear to be a free declaration of religious belief.

The proceedings end#

Phips ended the special court in October 1692. A new Superior Court began hearing remaining cases in January 1693, and the crisis subsided. The archive dates the episode through the end of May 1693.[1]

Reading the surviving record#

The digital archive supplies court documents, manuscript images, maps, letters, and biographical material. Its transcription project also addresses errors in earlier printed collections.[1][3] Readers can therefore compare an examination with later testimony or a petition instead of relying on a dramatized retelling.

An accusation documents what someone alleged. A warrant records an official action. Neither, on its own, verifies a supernatural event. That distinction is essential when connecting Salem with later histories of the Devil, witchcraft, and moral panic.

References

  1. Benjamin Ray, The Salem Witch Trials Digital Archive: How and Why (2022) · University of Virginia historical overview and account of the archive's manuscripts and transcription project. (accessed 2026-10-01) ↩
  2. University of Virginia, Salem Witch Trials: Further Explanation · Archive overview of the initial accusations, special court, spectral evidence, and pressure to confess. (accessed 2026-10-01) ↩
  3. University of Virginia, Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive · Primary documents, transcriptions, maps, and biographical resources for the 1692-1693 proceedings. (accessed 2026-10-01) ↩